This film not only raises suspicion on the subject of whether or not Marla created the paintings, but it also has a lot to do with the nature of modern art in general-- is modern art (particularly non-objective and conceptual art) even valid as art, or is it just a scam? What separates her work from that of Willem de Kooning, for example? Is she as good as he is? Are deKooning and other well-known abstract/non-objective painters as great as they are supposed to be?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc92/3cc92220024165d74e97d0f1afab272c07f2de5f" alt=""
Olmstead, Darlene's Bikini, 48" x 48", 2004
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f835a/f835abca90ed7d818b66a48dc7ad3ba16614638a" alt=""
de Kooning, Woman VI, 36" x 46", 1953
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e46f7/e46f7364c1f81c1d1935b767223343204a32e913" alt=""
Marla being assisted (coached?) by her father
Click here to go to the film's website
Click here for the article New Questions About Child Prodigy
1 comment:
I like a tree in naples. Don't know how it relates to the title, but that's ok, its good. catherine
Post a Comment